Skip to main content

Mt Warning - Response to Questions on Notice - APMP - "not legally enforceable"


Hon Mark Latham has had a response from the NSW Environment Minister to a series of questions about the current state of the Mt Warning Park Management Plan and its interaction with the new Aboriginal Place Management Plan, and inquiries about ongoing investigations by NPWS.  

Some key answers: 

  • An Aboriginal Place management plan is not itself legally enforceable 
  • 'Desecration' is not defined in the NPW Act.
  • PRTCPM has not been amended to include APMP (it was amended "to recognise the establishment of the Wollumbin Aboriginal Place." this is not the Plan.)
  • Investigation into Jan 26, 2023 climb is "ongoing" 

https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/lc/papers/pages/qanda-tracking-details.aspx?pk=96871

1183 - Environment - PARKS AND RESERVES OF THE TWEED CALDERA PLAN OF MANAGEMENT

Latham, Mark to the Minister for Climate Change, Minister for Energy, Minister for the Environment, and Minister for Heritage

(Q1) Can the Minister advise whether the Parks and Reserves of the Tweed Caldera Plan of Management (PRTCPM) allows public access to climb the summit of Mt. Warning?

(A1) The Wollumbin summit track and Aboriginal Place is closed to public access under clause 6(1) of the National Parks and Wildlife Regulation 2019. The plan of management for Parks and Reserves of the Tweed Caldera 2004 is not the means by which walking access to the Wollumbin summit is restricted.

(Q2) Can the Minister advise when the PRTCPM was last amended to give effect to the Aboriginal Place Management Plan for Mt. Warning, which states, on page 19, that the PRTCPM “would require amendment to ensure the Aboriginal Place is managed in accordance with this Aboriginal Place Management Plan into the future”?

(A2) The Wollumbin summit was declared an Aboriginal Place in 2014 under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NPW Act). In 2019 the plan of management for the Parks and Reserves of the Tweed Caldera was amended to recognise the establishment of the Wollumbin Aboriginal Place.

(Q2a) If the PRTCPM has not yet been amended to give effect to the provisions of the Aboriginal Place Management Plan as described above, what is the present status of the legal enforceability of the provisions of the Aboriginal Place Management Plan?

(A2a) Section 85 of the NPW Act outlines the requirements to ensure the proper care, preservation and protection of an Aboriginal Place while Section 86(4) of the NPW Act provides that it is an offence to harm or desecrate an Aboriginal Place. An Aboriginal Place management plan is not itself legally enforceable but contains information relevant to the application of provisions of the NPW Act that apply to Aboriginal places. See also response to question 1.

(Q3) Can the Minister confirm that one of the seven protesters who climbed Mt. Warning on Australia Day was interviewed by National Parks and Wildlife Services investigators?

(A3) Yes.

(Q3a) What was the nature of this investigation?

(A3a) The investigation relates to the alleged unauthorised entry into Wollumbin National Park while the park was closed to the public as well as the allegation that this may have resulted in harm or desecration to an Aboriginal Place.

(Q3ai) Under what authority was this investigation taken?

(A3ai) The investigation is being undertaken by an officer authorised under Section 156B of the NPW Act.

(Q3aii) How many National Parks and Wildlife Services investigators were involved?

(A3aii) One Department of Planning and Environment Investigator and one National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) officer.

(Q3aiii) How long did the National Parks and Wildlife Services investigation take place?

(A3aiii) The investigation is ongoing.

(Q3b) Can the Minister confirm that among the issues raised was the alleged “desecration” of the site?

(A3b) Yes.

(Q3c) What other issues were the subject of the National Parks and Wildlife Services investigation?

(A3c) The alleged offences outlined in 3a were the only subject of the NPWS investigation.

(Q3d) What was the outcome of the National Parks and Wildlife Services investigation?

(A3d) The investigation is ongoing.

(Q3ci) Is there a report on this National Parks and Wildlife Services investigation?

(A3i) A report has not been prepared as the investigation is ongoing.

(Q3e) Is the report publicly available?

(A3e) Not applicable.

(Q3ei) If not, can the Minister provide a copy of this report?

(A3i) Not applicable.

(Q4) Can the Minister clarify whether a charge or allegation of “desecration” is open to National Parks and Wildlife Services investigators under the PRTCPM?

(A4) Under Section 86(4) of the NPW Act, it is an offence to harm or desecrate an Aboriginal place.

(Q4a) What is the definition of “desecration” under the PRTCPM?

(A4a) 'Desecration' is not defined in the NPW Act.

(Q4b) Under what provision of the PRTCPM is “desecration” addressed?

(A4b) See response to 4 above.

(Q4c) Under what provision of the PRTCPM are charges or allegations of “desecration” enforced?

 (A4c) See response to 4 above.

 

Question asked on 31 August 2023 (session 58-1) and published in Questions & Answers Paper No. 82

Answer received on 21 September 2023 and to be published in Questions & Answers Paper No. 94


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mount Warning: Aboriginal claims about summit climb are contested

"How can the public experience the spiritual significance of this land if they do not climb the summit and witness creation."   Ngaraakwal Elder Marlene Boyd RIP   NSW NPWS have the following description about Aboriginal attitudes to people climbing to the summit of Mt Warning on their webpage about the walking track: Wollumbin, which means ‘cloud catcher’ to some Aboriginal People, is a traditional place of cultural law, initiation and spiritual education for the people of the Bundjalung Nation. Under Bundjalung law, only certain people can climb the summit. Out of respect for their law and culture, consider not climbing the summit. These claims, including the very name applied to the mountain, are contested and it seems there is another story that NSW NPWS have not properly acknowledged and have long kept from public attention.  We came across this article from the Daily News February 24 2007 about Ngaraakwal Elder Marlene Boyd that makes for interesting reading. It seems

Mt Warning - Summit signing, time capsule

A Mt Warning Visit, summit signing Drove up the long road from Sydney, leaving early to grab a beer at the Mt Warning Hotel at Uki in the afternoon. There's a nice view of the summit from the smoker's deck. The tip of the mountain was catching clouds and then letting them go. I met Roger, a one-legged ex- navy seal and former security guard to Gloria Estafan. He was an interesting bloke, sucking a large Cuban cigar and slamming spiced rum on ice. He had one eye, apparently, he had lost the other blue pearl in a firefight with Somali terrorists in the Persian Gulf. We had a brief discussion of current affairs and the insanity of public parks being closed for no good reason, and vandalism of the tourism industry by a woke broken Bureaucracy - just light conversation. I mentioned I had a mission that might suit him and he agreed to join in. We headed to the Mt Warning Rainforest Caravan Park. Mt Warning from the Mt Warning Hotel Roads around the area are still not repaired from la

Chain and post removed at Mount Warning Summit Walk

The current situation is a disgrace and an insult to Park users and all Australians.  The Minister must instigate an independent audit and review of NSW NPWS management of the Park and develop a brighter vision of the Park's future.  The walk to the summit of Mt Warning in northern NSW is an iconic experience of the natural world. Views from the summit on a clear day provide an unrivaled vista over the Tweed River Valley, lush rainforests, eroded volcanic landscape and beaches on the coast. They fill visitors with a sense of awe and wonder. From a geological perspective, it is arguably the best-preserved erosion caldera in the world.  The 4.4km (8.8km return) track was completed in 1909 but the hike was firmly established as a popular tourist attraction in  1929  with the declaration of the area around the mountain as a National Park. The opening ceremony was attended at the summit by 200 people, some rode horses up the trail. The standard of the early track construction is extreme